Why are all your reviews of old games? I mean there are some crackers from back in the day but i want to see thoughts on newer titles. The mainstream reviewers are biased and paid off it's cuckoldry i tell ye! and we gamers need independant reviewers with honesty and integraty to show us what might be worth a buy and what is a load of shit. You have many indie titles on xbox/ps store like Isonzo where you can play as the germans! Thats worth a buy based on that alone so give that a whirl and unleash your inner hans! I also noticed that all your reviews are of games you like as they seem to get an excellent review everytime and that is biased. As a reviewer you need to review all types of games to help people with what they want to spend there hard earned cash on ( unless there foreign or a single mother as they get it handed to them ) those are the rules as a reviewer. Give us the technical details such as performance and if there are problems relating to that, graphical elements animation and more importantly immersion instead of a huge back story of the develper and when the studio opened and your life and when you first played the game and all that bullshit we're not interested in this stuff man give us the meat off the bone not the tinsel off the tree. The next reviews i wanna see is games like ww1 isonzo, the new call of duty, callisto protocal, high on life or last of us remastered.
Not sure why most of your reviews are of games many years old? Games most people have already played and know full well. As a reader I like to read reviews of new and upcoming games that I haven’t had the ability to play. As for the review itself, there’s a lot of unnecessary back story to your life which (and no offence) is quite irrelevant and can sometimes deter me from reading on. I came to read about the game, how it plays, any bugs, it’s performance, likes/dislikes, thoughts and a final verdict. This is just a long read on an old game, the pattern seems to be that the only games you review are games only you enjoy. Perhaps try broadening your library? Just my thoughts.
Why are all your reviews of old games? I mean there are some crackers from back in the day but i want to see thoughts on newer titles. The mainstream reviewers are biased and paid off it's cuckoldry i tell ye! and we gamers need independant reviewers with honesty and integraty to show us what might be worth a buy and what is a load of shit. You have many indie titles on xbox/ps store like Isonzo where you can play as the germans! Thats worth a buy based on that alone so give that a whirl and unleash your inner hans! I also noticed that all your reviews are of games you like as they seem to get an excellent review everytime and that is biased. As a reviewer you need to review all types of games to help people with what they want to spend there hard earned cash on ( unless there foreign or a single mother as they get it handed to them ) those are the rules as a reviewer. Give us the technical details such as performance and if there are problems relating to that, graphical elements animation and more importantly immersion instead of a huge back story of the develper and when the studio opened and your life and when you first played the game and all that bullshit we're not interested in this stuff man give us the meat off the bone not the tinsel off the tree. The next reviews i wanna see is games like ww1 isonzo, the new call of duty, callisto protocal, high on life or last of us remastered.
Not sure why most of your reviews are of games many years old? Games most people have already played and know full well. As a reader I like to read reviews of new and upcoming games that I haven’t had the ability to play. As for the review itself, there’s a lot of unnecessary back story to your life which (and no offence) is quite irrelevant and can sometimes deter me from reading on. I came to read about the game, how it plays, any bugs, it’s performance, likes/dislikes, thoughts and a final verdict. This is just a long read on an old game, the pattern seems to be that the only games you review are games only you enjoy. Perhaps try broadening your library? Just my thoughts.